<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highland Park (18 year)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/</link>
	<description>Scotch talk for the new generation of Scotch drinkers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scotch Noob</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-90608</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotch Noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-90608</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update, Brother Juniper, it looks like Highland Park has redone their website, and now the only mention of filtration is in the video you describe. I will update my post. I appreciate the fact-checking, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update, Brother Juniper, it looks like Highland Park has redone their website, and now the only mention of filtration is in the video you describe. I will update my post. I appreciate the fact-checking, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother Juniper</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-90586</link>
		<dc:creator>Brother Juniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-90586</guid>
		<description>I got the impression that Highland Park did use chill filtration on all their whiskies except the 30 and 40 year old.  See the video on their website where Gerry Tosh talks to Gordon Motion about it (and were they mis-spell &quot;chilll&quot; in the description).  They do seem to take some care to minimize the effects of the chill filtration, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the impression that Highland Park did use chill filtration on all their whiskies except the 30 and 40 year old.  See the video on their website where Gerry Tosh talks to Gordon Motion about it (and were they mis-spell &#8220;chilll&#8221; in the description).  They do seem to take some care to minimize the effects of the chill filtration, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason the Saj</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-72576</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason the Saj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-72576</guid>
		<description>This was the first scotch I bought.  I just recently started drinking scotch.  My favorite has been Macallan&#039;s 18. I found the Highland Park tasty, but a lot more smoked than the few other scotch brands I&#039;ve tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the first scotch I bought.  I just recently started drinking scotch.  My favorite has been Macallan&#8217;s 18. I found the Highland Park tasty, but a lot more smoked than the few other scotch brands I&#8217;ve tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scotch Noob</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-56383</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotch Noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-56383</guid>
		<description>McAulay, Those are some great choices! I particularly love GlenDronach 12. I wasn&#039;t crazy about the Uigeadail when I tried it, but it wasn&#039;t in isolation (it was at an Ardbeg tasting), and I think it deserves another shot. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McAulay, Those are some great choices! I particularly love GlenDronach 12. I wasn&#8217;t crazy about the Uigeadail when I tried it, but it wasn&#8217;t in isolation (it was at an Ardbeg tasting), and I think it deserves another shot. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McAulay</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-56348</link>
		<dc:creator>McAulay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-56348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a number of your reviews Noob. It would appear we have similar preferences. I cannot say I have a favorite, but I do always have the following on my bar.
Highland Park - 18 yo (perfect balance)
Ardbeg Uigeadail (complex and delicious)
GlenDronach 12 or 15 yo - depth and richness
Glenmorangie - Original - simple and sweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a number of your reviews Noob. It would appear we have similar preferences. I cannot say I have a favorite, but I do always have the following on my bar.<br />
Highland Park &#8211; 18 yo (perfect balance)<br />
Ardbeg Uigeadail (complex and delicious)<br />
GlenDronach 12 or 15 yo &#8211; depth and richness<br />
Glenmorangie &#8211; Original &#8211; simple and sweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scotch Noob</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-7134</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotch Noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-7134</guid>
		<description>Cato,
Also, I think, a better use of the money when compared to The Macallan 18, which is excellent but a bit variable and a bit oversold. If I had to pick only one 18 year-old, it would be a hard choice between this one and Talisker 18.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cato,<br />
Also, I think, a better use of the money when compared to The Macallan 18, which is excellent but a bit variable and a bit oversold. If I had to pick only one 18 year-old, it would be a hard choice between this one and Talisker 18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cato</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-7119</link>
		<dc:creator>cato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 05:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-7119</guid>
		<description>If I had to select only one &quot;desert island&quot; expression, Highland Park 18 YO would be it for me.  Crafted to a level of elegance like few other single malts, it possess amazing depth, complexity, and balance.  Remarkable consistency from year to year as well.  A near perfect dram in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to select only one &#8220;desert island&#8221; expression, Highland Park 18 YO would be it for me.  Crafted to a level of elegance like few other single malts, it possess amazing depth, complexity, and balance.  Remarkable consistency from year to year as well.  A near perfect dram in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scotch Noob</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scotch Noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>@J I would say that the Highland Park 18 is indeed thin-bodied in terms of texture (not chewy or oily), but it&#039;s definitely not subtle on flavor. Lots of tart/sour fruit and light smoke (not heavy smoke like Islay malts, but the peat is certainly present).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J I would say that the Highland Park 18 is indeed thin-bodied in terms of texture (not chewy or oily), but it&#8217;s definitely not subtle on flavor. Lots of tart/sour fruit and light smoke (not heavy smoke like Islay malts, but the peat is certainly present).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J White</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-5356</link>
		<dc:creator>J White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-5356</guid>
		<description>comments on net  say it Succulent, but then there thin comments.  how is it Succulent. is this like i chewy, or big flavorsome malt on that mouth. can&#039;t stand thin, light,subtitly there. looking to buy somethink in low price malts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comments on net  say it Succulent, but then there thin comments.  how is it Succulent. is this like i chewy, or big flavorsome malt on that mouth. can&#8217;t stand thin, light,subtitly there. looking to buy somethink in low price malts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Drier</title>
		<link>http://scotchnoob.com/2011/06/26/highland-park-18-year/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Drier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchnoob.com/?p=529#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>thanks for the (corryv)reckan-mendation!  i&#039;ll check it out: there&#039;s a decent chance that i can find it where i found the uigedail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the (corryv)reckan-mendation!  i&#8217;ll check it out: there&#8217;s a decent chance that i can find it where i found the uigedail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
