The Glenlivet 18 year

To recap, I think The Glenlivet 12 year is slightly better than its similarly-priced rival Glenfiddich 12. On the flip-side, my impression of The Glenlivet 15 year is of moderate improvement that doesn’t justify its price jump. Today, we look at The Glenlivet 18 year, one of the cheapest scotches on the market to have reached 18 years of age. I enjoyed its nemesis, Glenfiddich 18, and I enjoyed the price I got it for at Costco even more. Let’s see how this one fares.

Oddly for The Glenlivet, which staunchly uses ex-bourbon barrels for its maturation, the 18 contains sherry-matured spirit at 12-13% of its volume. Glenlivet does not add coloring agents, but does chill-filter its malts. Finally, this entry in the Glenlivet range gets a bump up in ABV to 43%. About time.

Nose: Hint of plum, but otherwise little sherry influence. Some vanilla, but not much wood. Where’s the green apple?

Palate: Nice thick body. Creamy, not oily. Golden raisins, fresh green figs, sugar cookies.

Finish: Not as smooth as I’d have thought for this age. Vanilla again, and some small amount of bitterness. Anise.

With Water: Brings out coconut on the nose, and some nice fresh banana. I actually like this banana – it smells fresh and clean. The water thins the body somewhat, and ups the acidity, but kills the palate in the process, making it watery. Skip the water.

Overall: The nice thing about the 12-year is the interesting fresh elements of green apple. The 15 also has some of that, but by the age of 18, it’s mostly gone. In its place isn’t woodiness, or sweetness, or even much complexity. I’m not sure what was happening in the barrel during those 6 extra years, but it wasn’t doing much to elevate this casual standard whisky, alas. That said, it’s hard to beat a decent, drinkable 18 year for under $80. That pricing strategy is the reason I enjoy the 12-year, so why not enjoy the 18 for the same reason? Keep in mind that the Glenfiddich 18 has more flavor and can be even cheaper (I once found it at Costco for $44 a bottle!). Shop accordingly.

The Glenlivet 18 year
43% ABV
ScotchNoob™ Mark:
Price Range: $65 - $80 [Sponsored Link]
Acquired: (1/4 oz tasting sample) K&L Wines and Spirits, Redwood City, CA
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , ,
9 Comments

9 Responses to The Glenlivet 18 year

  1. Brad says:

    Well said, I was expecting a bit smoother of a finish as well but overall I’m happy I tried it. It’s always a win if it was a gift! Heh

  2. David says:

    I had a dram after a nice dinner out last night. I expected a much smoother finish from an 18-year-old. Pleasant enough and well balanced, but not nearly as smooth as Dalwhinnie 15.

  3. Robert Jones says:

    The ultimate question is, based upon price, whether a scotch of this type is justifiable when it sales for $99.00, approximately, as it does in the great Commonwealth of Virginia. As a question, what is your thoughts of this one, at the price of $99.00 when one can buy the 12 year Glenlivit, at about $39.00 on sale, or the Old P. 12 year, which sales about the same price as the Glenlivit 12 year, in here Virginia. Ultimately, does price dictate, alone, the buying pattern, or should one sacrifice a bit, on the price, for what may be a bit more in quality. Or should one say, that for the price, the 18 years are not quite that special, and so, for for the reliable 12 year, and play is safe, if on the cheap. Thanks.

    • Hi Robert,
      I believe your question is, is Glenlivet 18 (or other “inexpensive” 18 year-olds) worth $99 when the younger products are $40? This might help a bit: http://scotchnoob.com/2013/08/26/older-is-not-always-better/ but there is no exact answer to your question for everyone. For many single-malt drinkers, the 12 year-old malts get “boring” and they start looking for improved quality or more complexity or maturity. For a first-time scotch drinker, I would say that a $99 scotch would not be worth the price. For someone who’s been drinking $40 – $50 malts and is starting to look for something new or special, a $99 scotch makes a good “special occasion” malt. Even after years of drinking single-malts, I would never drink a $99 scotch on a daily basis. Most of the malts in my cabinet are $50 ish.

  4. Tom says:

    What exactly is a “dram?”

    • Tom, great question. I spent an embarrassing amount of time last year trying to discover what exactly the metric equivalent of a “dram” is. Technically, the word is used in some fields to indicate a specific volume of liquid, but it’s something like 1/8th of a teaspoon (don’t quote me on that) – at any rate, clearly not the “dram” we’re talking about. The best answer I found is that the word is used in the UK often to mean a socially-acceptable (in context) quantity of straight spirit, without any agreed-upon quantity. A Scotsman might request a “wee dram” in the same way that we might ask for “just a tiny piece of cake” – we probably don’t really mean tiny, we’re just being polite.

      When I use the word, I’m generally referring to the amount of whisky (or whatever) that I would pour myself to enjoy as a drink. This is about the quantity that comes up to the widest point of a Glencairn glass, roughly 2 oz. I’ve also heard people refer to a dram as approximately 1.5 oz.

  5. Can you recommend Two brands of Scotch or Whisky Stones or Sphere molds? I like my drinks cool. Thank You for your reply in advance.

    • Hi Yolande,
      I haven’t used any of those products, so I can’t really recommend any. I have heard that the stainless-steel spheres are probably best at keeping a drink cool. When I do drink scotch (usually a scotch blend or an American or Irish whiskey) cold, I simply use clean ice from my freezer. A little water dilution actually helps with flavor, as long as you drink it relatively quickly (like any cocktail served over ice). This is especially true with higher-proof bourbons or ryes, since the dilution makes it easier to drink. The spherical ice molds, while cool-looking, seem overly fussy to me (I’d quickly abandon them after a few spheres. I don’t like to work for my drinks). You might look into those silicone ice trays with extra-large cubes. They’d accomplish the same thing as the spheres (more or less), with a lot less work. Also, frozen liquids are very easy to get out of silicone trays.

      • Erik R says:

        I’ve tried various stones and spheres that either don’t work very well or are too much work to have ready- as you mention. I don’t think the stones work very well. When the occasion happens that I want a chilled scotch (warm summer days) but don’t want to water my drink with melting ice I use a heavy glass I keep in the freezer. If the glass is thick enough it works to chill the whisky. I don’t see rocks or double old fashioned glasses with thick enough bases at the usual retail stores but you can find them at nicer stores that have a large crystal glassware selection. For whatever reason crystal glassware is often thicker and doesn’t necessarily need to be expensive. Amazon has some that aren’t expensive but you can’t hold it in your hand to see how heavy it is. The best one I have was a birthday gift of Tiffany Rock Cut Double Old Fashioned. Very thick base and the bottom of the glass looks like ice so it’s cool looking with whisky in it. They are my go-to whisky glasses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>