Trader Joe’s, via independent-bottler-to-the-Big-Box-stars Alexander Murray & Co., has released a few interesting whiskies (and a few duds) and generally has decent prices on various types of whiskies, for a grocery store anyway. I saw this one, plus a 12 year-old Highland malt, each for $30 and snagged both. While the label does not give any hints about the distillery (par for the course with Alexander Murray), the Trader Joe’s Fearless Flyer spilled the beans on both bottles by revealing the distillery locations. This one, located “on the banks of the River Lossie” can only refer to Glen Moray (although Glenlossie/Mannochmore comes close). This bottle came from a batch of barrels (1500 cases made means 9000 bottles means 6750 liters at 40% ABV means roughly 4500 liters at cask strength means somewhere in the neighborhood of 22-25 ex-bourbon barrels). Note: I’ve chosen to release both tastings today, so if you missed the other one, click the link.
I can only guess that a batch of Glen Moray was deemed too nasty to participate in current owner La Martiniquaise’s Label 5 blended scotch brand and instead sat around for another couple of years, reaching the ripe old age of 13, until Alexander Murray came calling.
The Glen Moray is aged in ex-bourbon casks. (The bottle says “Matured in Oak Casks”. Duh.) It was distilled in 2002 and bottled in 2015 at 40% ABV after 13 years of aging. I found it at Trader Joe’s in California for $30.
So, you’d think that two different bottles, priced equally, released by the same independent bottler at the same time, and with (almost) the same age would be of roughly the same quality. The labels are even so similar that they’re hard to tell apart! But no, where the 2002 Speyside (Glen Moray) is bland, bitter, and unappetizing, this 2003 Highlands (Deanston) is light, sweet, crisp, and super drinkable. To me, this is a parable. You just can’t go by the label, the price, the age, or anything else on the outside of the bottle. You just have to try the damn stuff to see if it’s any good. Good thing you all have me to do it for you. (I’m kidding – go try them for yourself and see if I’m wrong.)
Nose: Faint orange peel. Nutty nougat. Otherwise a pretty standard malty ex-bourbon aroma (cereal grains, faint vanilla, etc.).
Palate: Thin body. Marzipan. A little bitter (wood char), but mostly bland.
Finish: Short. Oaky and nutty. Not much sweetness or individuality. Fades with a bitter note (like rancid walnuts).
With Water: A few drops of water add nothing interesting to the aroma, nor the palate. They might make the finish a little more crisp. Maybe.
Overall: Bland, and somewhat bitter. Not a successful malt. This should probably not have been saved from the mountain of “blending fodder” barrels for which it was no doubt originally destined. There are no redeeming florals, fruits, or even cloying sweets. Instead, it mostly just tastes like insipid wood and alcohol. If you’re standing in a Trader Joe’s on a smartphone right now, trying to make a decision, I’ll make it for you: Get the 12 year-old Highland (psst! It’s from Deanston) instead.