Black Bottle Blended Scotch

I’ve had a lot of recommendations for this. Lesson learned: Commenters know what’s up! This is good stuff at an amazing price. Read on:

Black Bottle is a blended scotch comprised of (according to the website) “seven of the island [Islay]‘s classic malts alongside some of the finest grain available.” Since Islay only has eight active distilleries (Lagavulin, Laphroaig, Ardbeg, Bowmore, Caol Ila, Bruichladdich, Bunnahabhain, and the too-recently-opened Kilchoman) and it’s unlikely to contain any of the very rare and sought-after closed distilleries (Malt Mill, Port Ellen), I think we can safely say what’s in it. In fact, before Kilchoman opened, Black Bottle’s marketing verbage proudly proclaimed the inclusion of product from “all of Islay’s single malt distilleries”. The Black Bottle brand is now owned by Burn Stewart Distillers Ltd., which also owns Bunnahabhain, so it’s also a safe bet that a lot of that distillery’s malt makes it into the blend.

Black Bottle tends to win a lot of awards and has quite a following, even among malt-heads. Oh, here’s the kicker: this guy’s only about $20 a bottle in the US.

Nose: Tarry, earthy overtones, with a smoky barbeque sauce-like sweetness. Oh God, now I can’t smell anything but barbeque sauce! The alcohol tickle is piquant – despite the baseline 40% ABV, this crawls right up your nose. Undercurrents of chewing tobacco and mulching leaves.

Palate: Nice creamy mouthfeel. Green and vegetal up front, then some salted caramels and finally a burst of woodsmoke. Very tame on the tongue. Really, it’s very orderly for something that’s all Islay.

Finish: Only of medium length, despite all the peat. Sweet, burnt sugar, freshly-dug earth. Very mild bitterness in the back on the tongue. Remains sweet and smoky through the fade-out. Pleasant.

With Water: Several drops of water yield processed white sugar in the nose, but kill the smoke. Mouthfeel is not compromised, but the finish is more grassy and bitter. This doesn’t need water – I wouldn’t bother.

Overall: I can see why this has a following. It’s peaty in all the right ways, has the thick, viscous mouthfeel that only a blend with good grain whisky has, and is the right price. At $20, this blows The Black Grouse, Finlaggan, and the mildly-peated Johnnie Walker Black Label out of the water, no contest. Really, a $20 peated blend and I can’t find anything bad to say about it.

Also, it’s worth pointing out that this bottle is a perfect choice for mixed drinks that call for a smoky note. While most of us wouldn’t dream of pouring Lagavulin 16 into a shaker, Black Bottle has both the price point and the level of quality necessary to be great in a cocktail.

I suppose if you were jaded enough, you could say this blend is on the tame side of the peat spectrum. Personally when I’m in the mood for peat I want the full, intense single-malt experience, so I’m not likely to stock a bottle of this… but if you’ve been frustrated in your efforts to find a value blend and enjoy peat, this is your bottle. Either way, I’m calling it a “Must Have” because you can’t find a better peated blend – or almost any blend, for that matter – for this price.

Black Bottle Blended Scotch
40% ABV
ScotchNoob™ Mark:
Price Range: $18 - $25
Acquired: (30ml sample bottle purchased at Master of Malt)
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
23 Comments

23 Responses to Black Bottle Blended Scotch

  1. Robert says:

    I bought this on Ralfy’s recommendation about a year ago and it took me a long time to choke down. Yes, it is inexpensive, but not at all what I can ever enjoy neat. I finally poured about 3-4 oz of Ardbeg 10 in it and it became acceptable. Probably okay as a mixer though. Too much grain and Bunna for my tastes.

    • Colin says:

      I agree. I was pretty excited when I finally found this in one of my local stores, but I thought it was merely ok. I liked what I could taste of the malt, but I felt the grain was just too overpowering. For cheap blends, I was more impressed with Bank Note, despite the fact that I’m normally a big Islay fan.

      I’ll definitely give Black Bottle another try – I really want to like it, as a $20 peated blend is *very* appealing to me.

    • Ben says:

      I agree completely, Robert. Tempted by the low price, I bought this after reading a favorable review in the Murray “Bible.” These things are always matter of taste, but it’s hard for me to understand the favorable review there or here. The whiskey has too much smoke for people who like fruitier Scotches and not nearly enough for any Islay fan. (As a Laphroaig loyalist, I found the stuff deeply unsatisfying.) It also has the kind of nasty, chemical finish seen with inexpensive blends. Perhaps that’s the “grain” that others mention.

      I ended up using this as my “Scotch on days when my tastebuds are out of whack” and was glad when it was gone. Never again.

  2. Allen says:

    I find Black Bottle just okay. I think as a mixer (though I can’t think of many drinks to use it in) it would work quite well. Perhaps the problem was that I managed to acquire Black Bottle 10 Year, which they no longer make, and it was head and shoulders above the standard bottling.

  3. Eric says:

    I have a strange account of black bottle. The first bottle I bought impressed me very much for a blend. It has some smoke and some peat (more peat than smoke). The second bottle I bought has lost it’s luster. It has a distinct vanilla/grainy note that has really began to bother me. I enjoy JWB’s smoke note more than this, and almost find Chivas 12 more satisfying, despite my enjoyment of Islay (laphroaig is my favorite.) I found the author’s Finlaggan comparison interesting…If you really want peat, Finlaggan blows this blend away. I honestly think Finlaggan, due to it’s young age probably, has as much peat as any malt on earth. It’s not as tasty or enjoyable, but Finlaggan truly rivals the Laphroaig 10 on pure smoke. Ir’s not complex at all (only peat, no other notes basically), but for budget peat needs, I’d have to recommend Finlaggan.
    All that being said, I still think Black Bottle is better than the majority of blends. It is in the same vain as JWB and Highland Park 12 if you ask me. Although greatly inferior to HP12 and on the same level with (price considered) with Johnnie Walker Black.
    I really enjoy your reviews though!

    • Thanks for your comments, Eric. I think a lot of people have said that Black Bottle has declined a bit, which is entirely possible considering the current difficulty of sourcing malt whisky in Scotland (due to massive demand).

  4. Joe says:

    I did buy the black bottle. I found it to be good for the price. Do not add water to this and it is drinkable. The smokey blend I prefer is Islay Mist. Islay Mist is smokey and sweet. It also sells for about the same as the black bottle. Give it a try.

  5. Jason says:

    Black Bottle is goooood stuff for $20. “Peat Heads” be warned-the smoke is faint.

  6. Ken says:

    Bought this on this site’s recommendation and haven’t been disappointed. I don’t have refined Scotch tastes, but I think it compares favorably to Glenlivet 12 for half the price and is FAR superior to Johnnie Walker Black.

  7. John says:

    I just a got a bottle of this and was underwhelmed. I will say it was better than JW in the under $30 range. I did did not find it better than the bottle of Black Grouse I had just about finished. Drinking both side by side the Grouse had far more distinct and rich flavors to me. I wonder if the black bottle has gone down a bit, like others are saying. Of course the black Grouse is a higher cost($18 vs $32). Will I drink it? sure for my tastes my go to bottle is one of the Ardbeg’s I keep for myself as real treat.

  8. Al Gozinya says:

    The quality of this product has diminished from a year ago when last purchased. The ratio of grain to malt has dramatically increased as the apparent quality and quantity of the malts within have diminished noticeably. Drinks hot and unbalanced.

  9. Nate says:

    This was on my list to try for quite a while. I finally got around to picking some up, but I’m very underwhelmed. The first taste was pleasing, but by the end of the glass I was wondering if I could stick with it. Very lackluster, not very smoky, harsh aftertaste. Yuck. At least I’m not out very much money!!

    Hopefully Al’s comment is true, otherwise my taste buds are way out of whack. I just read that they’re relaunching this blend, along with new packaging – hopefully it can return to its former self.

  10. RCL says:

    Black Bottle finally showed up at BevMo. My view is pretty much inline with our host. All the underwhelmed naysayers are showing off their snobbery IMHO. I admit Ralfy’s description of the nose as “glorious” is a little over the top but his motive is clearly expressed in his delight encouraging his fans to present Black Bottle blind to your local scotch snobs.

    I do agree with Ralfy that the water actually does aid the flavor. It’s fatter, in wine-tasting parlance, after the water. It’s not really smokey to start with but I don’t notice the loss of peat with a tbls of water that some noted.

    Darn good whiskey. I’ll keep it on the shelf for sure. It tastes great and has the spine of grain to mix well for guests. It’s no single malt celebrity but I’m sure to go through a dozen Black Bottles for every Glendronach Revival.

  11. Eric says:

    I’ve been reading how there is a new formula for Black Bottle, along with a return to the black bottle instead of the green. In Illinois, I found a lot of the older green bottles in stock at Binny’s, but can’t find the new ones. Has anyone tried to compare the new to the older formula. From what I can see online, the new formula is not all Islay, and not nearly as peated.

    • Marc says:

      I just opened the new bottle after finishing an old green one. The liquid is a lot darker (i.e. more caramel) and I mainly taste brown sugar. Not even close to the old stuff. I would not recommend this over Grant’s, which to me sets the baseline for good affordable blends.

      For a blend similar to old stuff, check out Té Bheag.

  12. Sudduth Cummings says:

    How does it compare with Buchannan’s which is mildly peaty and a reasonable price? Also, how about Teacher’s which no one has mentioned yet? Not bad stuff.

  13. Steve says:

    Yes, Black Bottle is good, but is it far better, or even better at all, than a number of other blends you trash, such as Dewars WL? I’d say, no. In fact, I doubt if you, or many, could pass a blind taste test on Black Bottle versus JW Red. Yes, Red, not Black. I think your blend reviews reflect an understandable prejudice aginst the mass-market blends. Understandable but not reflective of reality.

    • Steve,
      Prejudice or not, I like what I like and I dislike what I dislike. I have no agenda. I have no stock in single malt distilleries. Every blogger on the web is variously accused of this kind of slant, and I don’t know what kind of conspiracy people think is going on. I taste a blend, I dislike it, I write about it. Sometimes the opposite happens, and I write about that. It’s as stupid-simple as that. There are plenty of excellent blends (Bank Note, for example, and Great King Street) that I rate highly. Why? Because I have some kind of deep-seated hatred of Dewars that I’m quietly plotting their demise by dissuading a handful of blog readers per week? No. Because I think they taste good. Period.

  14. Steve says:

    Scotch Noob, I don’t mean to imply that you’re “plotting” a conspiracy against the mass-market blends, such as WL. But there is a certain “romance” to the small volume labels — call it the exclusivity that comes with something less common, or easily available. But I also think many scoff at the mass-market blends because of a general impression in educated society that anything that’s mass marketed is for the “masses” and thus garbage, or unsophisticated, at best. I find that when friends ask for a recommendation on a blend for their bar, and I say Dewars WL or JWR, they look at me as if I must not know scotch and that I’ve just repeated what I saw on a recent billboard. But if I say Black Bottle, they’re impressed — since they’ve never heard of it — and they act as if I just let them in on a secret known only to the chosen few (which they certainly want to be part of). Regardless, I agree Black Bottle is good. But it’s not that much better than DWL or JWR.

  15. Not so fast people. Better read the label on your classic green bottle. The old label read:

    “This rich golden blend contains malts from each of the distilleries on Scotland’s most revered whisky producing island, Islay.”

    It contained seven Islay malts and was simply lovely. And how ’bout the green bottle but with the new label? Hope you’re sitting down…

    “This blended Scotch marries Islay malts with Highland, Speyside and Lowland malt and grain whiskies”.

    And this was before the new black glass bottle. Diageo has completed prostituted this once fine product and in devious fashion to boot. This is an insult to all – like me – who thought I was purchasing the real and classic product. Shame on them. Join us by boycotting Diageo as much as you can. In the case of the badly altered Black Bottle, that’ll be easy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>