Auchentoshan Three Wood

Auchentoshan is usually known as a light, gentle spirit, originating from the Lowlands which is also known for producing generally light, gentle spirits. Auchentoshan reinforces this reputation by triple-distilling its malt in the Irish style. By its very nature, triple-distilled malt whisky has fewer flavor compounds – by volume – than spirit distilled by the more usual double distillation. It also has less bad flavor compounds, so the style has its proponents. Throw all that out the window, though, if you’re looking at Three Wood. It turns out Auchentoshan, in its shyness, isn’t just a canvas for sherry influence, but instead totally disappears under the weight of the Pedro Ximenez and Oloroso casks (the third “wood” is ex-bourbon). What results from the process – apparently 10 years in ex-bourbon (which is longer than the cheaper Classic bottling), 1 year in Oloroso sherry, and then a final year in Pedro Ximenez sherry – is a sherry monster of undeniable weight and ferocity.

Is it worth the extra $20 over its Classic sibling? If you like sherry more than you like Auchentoshan, then yes. Yes it is.

Nose: A powerful blossom of sherry greets the nose. Nutty, with plenty of dried fruits (predominantly fig). Some nice acidity comes through – like cranberry, or red wine vinegar – and a bit of caramelized sugar. Overall, the impression is of a mid-aged heavily sherried malt where the sherry is doing all of the work.

Palate: Viscous body, heavy with notes of balsamic reduction, fig paste, dark chocolate, and hazelnuts. Very appealing.

Finish: On the short side. Tarry molasses and override plums. A little minty. While the fruit notes slide to the burnt side, like port reduction beginning to scorch in the pan, there are some nice concentrated dried fruit notes and a heavy nuttiness that continues to the end. No undue bitterness.

With Water: A few drops of water might coax out a little more caramel and nut meats, but doesn’t appreciably improve the experience. I’d skip it.

Overall: If this was once Auchentoshan, then the sherry monster murdered it and stuffed it in a closet. While Auchentoshan Classic is understated, vanilla, and crisp, this is resinous, sticky-sweet, and overripe. That’s not to say it’s bad. While the Auchentoshan rots slowly in its closet, the sherry monster throws a wild party – the kind that ends with garments hanging from chandeliers – and there’s some value in that raw, undiluted expression of sherry. Good sherry, too, the PX sherry really shines here. If you’re a fan of sherry in all its guises then you must grab a bottle, bypass the police tape, and witness the gory crime scene for yourself.

ScotchNoob™ Mark:

About The Distillery

Auchentoshan (a toughie to pronounce: Aw-ken/tosh-an) is one of the few remaining Lowlander distilleries in Scotland. It’s also notable for its use of “triple distillation” to make its spirit. This means rather than using two stills to distill the beer-like wash twice, like most Scottish distilleries, Auchentoshan processes the new-make spirit in three stills (three times). This creates a higher-proof final distillate (around 82% ABV) which is lighter and sweeter in flavor than most Scotch. I wonder if they ever release a cask-strength bottling! Wowza! [update: They do, but as the whisky is diluted to typical 'cask-strength' of around 63% ABV, it's not much stronger than other whiskies. What I really want to try is the new-make spirit. :) ] Note that many Irish distillers also triple-distill their whiskey.

Auchentoshan Three Wood
43% ABV
ScotchNoob™ Mark:
Price Range: $57 - $65
Acquired: (30ml sample bottle) masterofmalt.com
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 Comments

3 Responses to Auchentoshan Three Wood

  1. Craig says:

    I had been overlooking this whisky up until this review, thinking that the triple distillation might make it too vodka-like. I hadn’t considered that it would allow the sherry to get the most out of its relatively short time in the sherry casks. I might give this a try I run out of Glendronach 12.

    Speaking of Glendronach, how does this compare? Also, any thoughts on Auchentoshan’s 12 year old offering?

    • @Craig, I haven’t had the 12 year-old, but I thought the 10 was only marginally better than the Classic. I also wasn’t hugely impressed by the 18 (which I thought should be better than it was).

      I think the Glendronach and the Three Wood share a “meaty” quality to the sherry, where everything isn’t just sugar and fruit. The GD 12 has more maltiness and nuttiness, but the Three Wood has more fruit and a more focused sherry character. They’re comparable in quality.

  2. Ryan S says:

    I wholeheartedly agree with your review.
    This was my fifth bottle of scotch, and at the time I wasn’t sure what type of scotches I liked.
    I was quite impressed, and because of Triple Wood I didn’t give up on scotch!
    It would be very difficult for a new scotch drinker to not love the triple wood.

    I’ve compared Triple Wood to Aberlour a’bunadh, and between the two I’d go with the later, as A’Bunadh is cask strength.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>