To get something out of the way – in the UK and other markets this NAS Tomatin expression is sold as “Tomatin Legacy” while in the US it’s sold as “Tomatin Dualchas”, which is the Scots Gaelic word for ‘heritage’ or ‘legacy’. I guess they caught on that Americans will fall for a romantic-sounding Gaelic name while the rest of the world sees through that. I was going to write about feeling insulted but then I realized that it’s probably true.
This bottling, whatever its name, is the NAS (no-age-statement) entry-level bottling from the Tomatin distillery in the village of Tomatin in the Scottish Highlands. The distillery is owned by the same Japanese holding company that owns the largest distiller of Shochu in Japan, Takara Shuzo. Dualchas is vatted from Tomatin single malt aged in a combination of ex-bourbon and virgin (new) American oak casks. The virgin oak is intended to give the under-matured malt component an extra dose of wood extractives, especially vanilla. It’s worth noting that a number of American single-malt producers are also using this trick, sometimes aging their young malts in 100% new oak to great effect. Dualchas is bottled at a reasonable 43% ABV, and retails for an equally-reasonable $25 or so in the US.
Touches like the new oak, the 43% ABV, and the recent upgrade of their 10 year-old standard bottling to a 12 year-old one show that the distillery is making an effort to attract modern malt drinkers who pay attention to such details. I guess it worked on me… or maybe it was the romantic-sounding Gaelic name.
Nose: Shortbread cookies, banana cream. Faint nose tickle. Light malt, and creamy oatmeal. Simple.
Palate: Syrupy body. Sweet up front with malted milk, banana pudding, and a very low – very soft – tongue burn. Nilla wafers and crème brûlée.
Finish: Short. Very slightly tannic (drying), and without bitterness. Mild vanilla extract, which fades quickly.
With Water: A few drops of water adds an unfortunate alcohol burn to the aroma, and brings out a grassy, vegetal note that wasn’t there before. Avoid water with this one.
Overall: A simple, pleasurable confection. Limited in complexity, and leaning a little too heavily in the banana direction (a pet peeve of mine), but quite pleasant for only $25, and despite lacking an age statement. If Nilla wafers dipped in banana pudding sounds good to you, you will likely enjoy this. If not – there are single malts for slightly more money (Glenlivet 12 or Glenmorangie 10 for example), although as pointed out in the comments below, those two are not really much “better”. For “better”, you’ll need to look in the $40+ range, at least according to California pricing…
An interesting aside: I liked this $25 NAS malt much more than I liked the $28 12-year from the same distillery. It could have been a bad bottle or context or any number of other variables, or it could be anecdotal evidence that bottles with age statements are not always better than bottles without.
I’ve never had this, but over the past year I have had two bottles from Tomatin that I enjoyed. One was the core range 14 year old finished in ruby port pipes and the other was a 12 year old North American special edition finished for three years in French oak. Both were non-chilfiltered, naturally colored, bottled at 46% and reasonably priced. Have you ever had either?
I want to correct what I wrote about the 14 yr old official bottling. It is finished in tawny port pipes, not ruby port, which makes it quite different from Glenmorangie QR.
Hi Joe, I haven’t had either of those – only the 12 and the Dualchas so far. I wasn’t crazy about the 12, but I’m open to trying more from the distillery. So many whiskies, so little time!
Mr. Noob,
I have a question for you. Here you recommended Tomatin Dualchas, and it is accordingly rated as Recommended, but then you say you recommend Glenmorangie 10 – which is rated Not Recommended – even more than the Recommended Tomatin Dualchas. Can you please clarify your recommendation?
A good question. I don’t have a great answer, except that reviewing consistency is a lofty goal across 10 years. (Also “rating drift” is a big part of the reason I don’t use numeric ratings.) I believe what happened is that for me “simple and drinkable” at $24 is an automatic Recommended rating, whilst “simple with some drawbacks” at $30 is a gray area, despite Glenmorangie’s reputable brand name. You’re correct that this results in a contradiction in my description above. I guess I was casting about for single malt alternatives near the price-point and those two were the only ones that came to mind. To be totally honest, if you don’t enjoy Dualchas you probably won’t like Glenmo 10 or Glenlivet 12 either. Thanks for the correction!
Or maybe they figure there are more people of Scotch ancestry in America than anywhere else, including ones who know a little Gaelic, unlike the rest of the world, and it might be worth playing the distant heritage angle.
now in november 2022, 25 bucks for this bottle seems impossible.